Comments 4
I'm not sure that this article is relevant today. ASP.NET Core allows us to build crossplatform solutions, has a really high performance and is really suitable for both startups and enterprise.
while ASP.Net is a paid Microsoft platform
— Microsoft owns it.

Why so? To be objective, look at ASP.NET Core, it's open-source and free too.

ASP.NET doesn’t allow for as many irregularities in its code

ASP.NET platform, .NET runtime or C#-compiler?

— It [ASP.NET] operates only on a Microsoft server

It's a lie (Mono and ASP.NET Core).

— [ASP.NET] Not as good as PHP for website development

It's not an objective point of view. Given motivation is poor.

— Based on closed source technology.

It's a lie, as I pointed before.
First of all, thank you for the article.

> In reality, however, there is very little difference between the performance of PHP websites and ASP.NET websites.

Seems, it was the last line of this article for me.
I completely don't agree with it. It has big performance difference, and casualty .NET and PHP are pretty different technologically, it's hard to compare.
Only those users with full accounts are able to leave comments.  , please.