Основатель ARM считает политику в отношении Huawei разрушительной для всей технологической отрасли

Я думал, что эти самые гендеры придумали именно для того, чтобы не говорить о вульгарных полах.

А еще этот же Евросоюз прекрасно показывает что ему наплевать на человеческие права. Нельзя рассказывать про ужасы тоталитарного Китая одновременно сажая представителя саудитов на место главы комиссии ООН по правам женщины. Двоемыслие такое двоемыслие…

Страница 4 Где же цифра, где она?
NOTE ON AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL’S FIGURES ON THE USE OF THE DEATH PENALTY
This report covers the judicial use of the death penalty for the period January to December 2017. As in
previous years, information is collected from a variety of sources, including: official figures; judgments;
information from individuals sentenced to death and their families and representatives; reporting by
other civil society organizations; and media reports. Amnesty International reports only on executions,
death sentences and other aspects of the use of the death penalty, such as commutations and
exonerations, where there is reasonable confirmation. In many countries governments do not publish
information on their use of the death penalty. In Belarus, China and Viet Nam, data on the use of the
death penalty is classified as a state secret. During 2017 little or no information was available on some
countries – in particular Laos, Libya, Malaysia, North Korea (the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea),
Syria, Viet Nam and Yemen – due to restrictive state practice and/or armed conflict.
Therefore, with only a few exceptions, Amnesty International’s figures on the use of the death penalty
are minimum figures. The true figures are likely to be higher. Where the organization obtains fuller
information on a specific country in a given year this is noted in the report.
In 2009 Amnesty International stopped publishing its estimated figures on the use of the death penalty
in China, a decision that reflected concerns about how the Chinese authorities misrepresented Amnesty
International’s numbers. Amnesty International always made clear that the figures it was able to publish
on China were significantly lower than the reality, because of the restrictions on access to information.
China has yet to publish any figures on the death penalty; however, available information indicates that
each year thousands of people are executed and sentenced to death. Amnesty International renews its
call on the Chinese authorities to publish information on the use of the death penalty in China.
Where Amnesty International receives and is able to verify new information after publication of this
report, it updates its figures online at www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/death-penalty
In tables and lists, where “+” appears after a figure next to the name of a country – for example,
Indonesia (47+) – it means that Amnesty International confirmed 47 executions, death sentences or
persons under sentence of death in Indonesia but believes that there were more than 47. Where “+”
appears after a country name without a figure – for instance, Iran (+) – it means that Amnesty
International has corroborated executions, death sentences or persons under sentence of death (more
than one) in that country but had insufficient information to provide a credible minimum figure. When
calculating global and regional totals, “+” has been counted as 2, including for China.
Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception regardless of the nature
or circumstances of the crime; guilt, innocence or other characteristics of the individual; or the method
used by the state to carry out the execution. The organization campaigns for total abolition of capital
punishment.
А в Annex 1 как раз указывается 1000+